Videos

Distributed Transactions

I this video, we review serializability and three systems with distributed ACID transactions, namely Spanner, Calvin, and FoundationDB. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In-memory vs. On-disk Databases

Image
Figure 1 shows the main difference between in-memory and on-disk databases: An in-memory database stores the data in memory and uses disk for backup, while an on-disk database stores the data on disk and uses memory for caching.  Figure 1. In-memory vs On-disk storage engines
Read more

ByteGraph: A Graph Database for TikTok

Image
ByteGraph is a distributed graph database developed by ByteDance, the company behind the popular social network TikTok. As a large social media platform, ByteDance handles an enormous amount of graph data, and using a specialized graph database like ByteGraph is essential for efficiently managing and processing this data. In 2022, ByteDance published a paper on ByteGraph at the VLDB conference. In this post, I will provide an overview of my understanding of ByteGraph and highlight some of the key points from the paper that I found interesting.
Read more

The Paxos algorithm, when presented in plain English, is very simple

Image
Consensus is one of the fundamental problems in distributed systems. In this post, we want to see what is consensus and review the most famous consensus algorithm—Paxos. we will see that despite exaggeration about its complexities, Paxos, at least the singe-decree Paxos that aims to achieve consensus on a single value, is actually very intuitive and easy to understand.
Read more

Eventual Consistency and Conflict Resolution - Part 1

Image
Eventual consistency is one of the defining characteristics of many modern data stores. By getting rid of strong consistency and embracing eventual consistency, service providers can keep their services available even when replicas cannot talk to each other. Eventual consistency also removes the performance bottlenecks of strong consistency and lets us scale the system much more easily. Due to its significant benefits, eventual consistency has been widely adopted in the industry. Every day, when you are using social networks, shopping online, or even when you are doing online banking, most likely you are using services that rely on eventual consistency.
Read more

Amazon DynamoDB: ACID Transactions using Timestamp Ordering

Image
Amazon DynamoDB uses a lightweight transaction protocol via timestamp ordering. Although both Spanner and DynamoDB use timestamps in their transaction protocol, DynamoDB seems significantly simpler than Spanner; while Spanner uses 2PL and MVCC and needs TrueTime, DynamoDB only relies on timestamp ordering and does not use any locking or MVCC scheme. In this post, we want to review the DynamoDB transaction protocol and compare it with Google Spanner. 
Read more